Donald Trump’s recent announcement that there will be no third debate in the current election cycle is stirring conversation. Many see it as a tactical move, especially considering Vice President Kamala Harris’ standing in the polls. Harris, some argue, is seeking another debate to close the gap, making her case to voters who remain undecided or skeptical. By denying a third debate, Trump may be using this as a strategic play to maintain his momentum.
Harris has been pushing for another debate, hoping it would provide her a platform to counter Trump’s messaging and sway those critical swing voters. Her team believes that another head-to-head could give her the opportunity to build on her previous performances and present her vision in a more comprehensive way. But without this debate, her options may narrow.
From Trump’s perspective, avoiding a third debate not only prevents Harris from gaining potential ground but also opens the door to leverage a different format — one that he may view as more favorable. Trump’s camp is reportedly pushing for a debate hosted by Fox, possibly with moderators who are seen as more neutral or even sympathetic to his campaign. In this scenario, the president could control the narrative better, focusing on issues he believes are central to his base without the perceived bias of what he has called “Kamala’s sorority sister.”
Whether or not this strategy will work in Trump’s favor remains to be seen, but by controlling the debate terms, he forces his opponents into a corner — something that has often worked for him in the past. As the election day looms, every move counts, and this one could be pivotal.